Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Erdo-gone? After Taksim, Turkish Leader?s Political Future May Hang in the Balance

By Sunday night, most of the businesses on Istiklal Avenue, Istanbul?s biggest pedestrian street, seemed to have had their front teeth knocked in. ATM screens glared and winked stupidly from behind broken glass monitors. Display windows were smashed up, facades and metal shutters covered with anti-government graffiti. Near Bekar Street, young people had taken over a number of buildings. Music, along with leftist banners, wafted out from their windows. Profiting from the lack of police, which had withdrawn from the area on June 1, vendors at the northern end of the street hawked bottles of beer, in plain and symbolic defiance of a recent ban on retail sales of alcohol between 10pm and 6am. (The bill, rushed through by Parliament last week, hasn?t yet been signed into law by President Abdullah G?l.)

At Gezi Park, the scene of a sit-in that had been repeatedly and violently dispersed by the police last week, fueling popular outrage as well as mass demonstrations and violent clashes in dozens of Turkish cities, the mood was jubilant. The park, whose planned demolition and conversion into a shopping mall styled as a replica of an Ottoman barracks and shopping arcade made it ground zero of the protests, brimmed with groups of young men and women camped out on the grass. They lit campfires and chanted slogans demanding the resignation of Turkey?s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo?an. At the adjacent Taksim Square, normally heaving with traffic, thousands of protesters sang, waved Turkish flags, and locked hands in a traditional line dance. Vendors sold roast chestnuts, cucumbers and slices of watermelon.

(MORE: Is Taksim Erdogan?s Tahrir Square?)

A few hundred yards away, beyond the scorched skeletons of three city buses, the landscape appeared even more surreal. Down the hill, waves of people attempting to reach protesters in another part of the city hurled themselves against lines of policemen, some throwing the gas canisters fired against them over the walls of a nearby soccer stadium, others ripping up road signs and giant billboards to construct barricades. The 20-floor high Intercontinental, a five star hotel, appeared unmoved by the chaos below. Unlike most of the businesses on Istiklal, it had somehow emerged unscathed ? no broken windows, not even a trace of graffiti. Inside its spacious, pristine lobby, young people in gas masks and construction helmets chatted animatedly, lounged on sofas, and charged their phone batteries as small groups of bewildered tourists looked on. The hotel, it turned out, had decided to open its doors to the protesters.

A pair of young women ? one in jean shorts and a fashionable pink hoodie, the other in sweatpants and a white T-shirt, both heavily made up ? stretched out on a pair of chairs. Only a pair of snorkeling goggles and a gas mask wrapped around the neck of the one in the hoodie made it clear they weren?t just friends reclining after a day of shopping.

?I voted in every election, but I never really cared that much about politics,? said Pelin ?avdur, the girl in the sweatpants. It was her first time demonstrating anything, she added. ?I?m fighting to protect my way of life. Erdo?an?s playing with our future, he?s not letting us breathe.?

(PHOTOS: Turkey?s mass protests.)

?Everyone?s agitated, there?s too many bans, the alcohol law, the ban on people kissing in public,? said her friend, Tu?ba Orbay, referring to a recent warning issued by Ankara subway officials to act ?in accordance with moral rules? after security cameras recorded a couple kissing. ?Everyone feels like Turkey is becoming Iran,? she said. ?The cup has overflowed.?

?It?s good that people have come out en masse. Erdo?an felt that he was more powerful than the people,? she added. ?But now the tables have turned.?

Erdo?an himself does not see it that way. Throughout the protests, he has remained defiant, refusing to acknowledge the protesters as anything more than ?marginal elements.? In a series TV appearances on Sunday, he dismissed them as ?looters? and ?bums,? called Twitter a ?scourge? and seemed to suggest that anyone who drank alcohol was an alcoholic. The significance of his only concession ? that Gezi Park would not be converted into a shopping mall after all ? faded immediately when he declared that he would proceed with plans to build a mosque in Taksim, whether the protesters or the main opposition liked it or not. On Monday, ignoring suggestions that he should adjust his travel plans, and downplaying the protests? importance, he departed on a four-day tour to North Africa.

(MORE: Erdogan?s tricky ties with the U.S.)

It was exactly the kind of imperious behavior that has riled Erdogan?s critics in recent years and which made him, more than anything or anyone else, the target of the ongoing protests. First elected in 2002, Erdo?an has since marched his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) to two more consecutive victories in the polls, including a landslide win in 2011, in which the AKP won 50 percent of the vote, nearly twice as much as the main opposition. In its first years at the helm, Erdo?an?s government passed a number of democratic reforms, reducing the power of the once omnipotent, ever-meddling military, granting new cultural rights to the country?s Kurdish minority, and cracking down on police torture and honor crimes against women.

Around 2005, however, just as accession negotiations with the EU commenced, its reformist zeal began to fizzle. The EU talks have since ground to a halt and Erdo?an seems to have busied himself with consolidating power across all institutions of the state and keeping the roaring economy on track, while jailing opponents inside the military and harassing dissenting journalists. With his power almost unchecked, the protesters? say, he has grown increasingly patronizing, domineering, and allergic to criticism.

(MORE:?TIME?s 2011 interview with Prime Minister Erdogan.)

Today, however, after a week of protests that have left at least two people dead and 3000 injured, Erdo?an may be becoming more vulnerable than ever. While the vast majority of the Prime Minister?s electorate seems to have stayed at home ? most of the protesters TIME encountered were leftists, students, and secularists, people who had never voted for Erdo?an in the first place ? there are signs of dissent among his political allies. Zaman, a newspaper owned by supporters of Fethullah G?len, a powerful Muslim cleric who had until recently remained close to Erdo?an, and whose followers are said to be a powerful force within the Turkish bureaucracy and the police, has run a number of critical articles. In Monday?s edition, ?hsan Da??, a veteran commentator, slammed Erdo?an and his government for their ?I?ll do as I please? attitude. A number of AKP bigwigs, meanwhile, though far from openly defying Erdo?an, have shown they are not reading from the same script as their leader.

On Tuesday, Turkey?s deputy prime minister, B?lent Ar?n?, apologized for the excessive use of force by the police, acknowledging that the Gezi protesters, with the exception of ?marginal and illegal groups,? had ?shown their legitimate, logical and righteous reaction.? He later agreed to meet with protest leaders on Wednesday morning. As of Tuesday evening, thousands of people were still out on the streets in Istanbul, but the clashes had died down. ?In the short run, this has all certainly damaged and weakened Erdo?an,? Suat K?n?kl?o?lu, a former AKP deputy, told TIME. ?I know a lot of people inside the party are unhappy with how he dealt with this, but they?re not able to voice it.?

(MORE: Erdogan and Turkey?s Ottoman past.)

The biggest challenge to Erdo?an may have come from President G?l, who helped the Prime Minister mold the AKP from an outlawed Islamist party in 2001 into a regional political juggernaut. G?l, who has served as president for the past six years, is yet to announce whether he intends to run again in 2014, a decision that would pit him directly against Erdo?an, who is known to covet the post and, after two terms, is no longer eligible to run for Prime Minister. Over the course of the protests, however, Gul has made it clear that he and the Prime Minister have drifted apart. When Erdo?an insisted in an interview that people should exercise their democratic rights at the ballot box, and not on the streets, Gul, within hours, retorted that democracy consisted of more than elections. Perhaps it was no coincidence that, after the President?s remarks, the news networks ? previously cowed into a blackout ? began covering the protests around the clock.

While the protests are yet to acquire the kind of critical mass that would force Erdo?an to even consider stepping down as Prime Minister, the next few days may be crucial to his hopes of winning the presidency next year. ?If he comes back from Africa, takes a conciliatory tone and accepts that he was defeated by the people on this one, he will have time to bounce back,? says K?n?kl?o?lu. ?But if he comes back and makes it clear that he doesn?t agree with what G?l has communicated, I think that will damage him further.?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/erdo-gone-taksim-turkish-leader-political-future-may-222821135.html

severe weather wichita brian wilson storm chasers david blaine gotye divine mercy

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.